
Food banks are a stop-gap measure, not the answer to hunger, agreed a panel brought together Wednesday, March 21, by Foodlink.
And the question is not really how to solve hunger, but how to solve poverty, they said.
“At a very basic level we need to commit to shorten, end the food lines,” said Julia Tedesco, executive director of Foodlink, the regional foodbank, and moderator of the discussion. About 60 people turned out for the panel presentation Wednesday afternoon at Three Heads Brewery.
“We have to stop looking at this as if the problem is how to build a better food bank,” said Daniel Bernhard of Mushroom Cloud, a Toronto consulting firm, and co-author of a report on nonprofit grocery stores whose purpose is to provide more access by low-income people. He is promoting the idea of the Social Purpose Grocery store that can stretch the low-income person’s food dollar so they have money available for other important expenses.
“It’s not a matter of whether people have enough food, it’s a matter of whether people have enough resources to buy food,” said Andy Fisher, author of “Big Hunger,” a book how corporate food interests have compromised the emergency food network.
Bernhard and Fisher said the charity model of supplying emergency food fails to address underlying causes of hunger, is unreliable, and doesn’t act in the best nutritional interests of the people who need help. Food donations, for instance, often include foods that are unhealthy or don’t fit dietary needs or customs of the people receiving the donations, they said.
“Charity is not justice. Charity is what a society does when there is no justice,” Fisher said. “We’re not going to solve hunger unless people have their share of power, their fair share.”
Fisher told a story about a food panty in the Washington, D.C., area that decided to decline donations of pastry, candy, sheet cakes and soda pop. It found a farmer who was glad to take the pastries and feed them to his pigs. But after about a month, the farmer said he couldn’t take the pastries off their hands anymore—the sweets were making the pigs too aggressive and fight.
Bernhard used Walmart to illustrate how large corporations may benefit from the emergency food system more than they help it with their donations to food banks. Some $13 billion in SNAP benefits are redeemed in Walmart each year, he said, which pays its workers so little that it has employees whose job is to assist other employees in signing up for these so-called food stamps. The employees who receive SNAP benefits then spend them at their workplace.
Some of the largest food producers and retailers in the country, including Walmart, are on the board of the national food banking network, Feeding America, he pointed out.
“These people do not have an interest in solving the problem.” Bernhard said. “They’re in business to make money, but it’s not necessarily our job to help them do it.”
Bernhard said the Canadian equivalent of Feeding America throws out one-quarter of the donations it receives because they’re unsuitable or unfit to serve. Yet the agency bears the costs of transporting those donations to the center, sorting the donations, and then disposing of them.
“How can we get into the market, not just clean up its mess?” he asked.
Foodlink has been trying to do that with its Curbside Market, a mobile vendor of produce and eggs that visits areas of the city that don’t have access to fresh-food groceries. Foodlink paired the initiative with a federal program that basically doubles the purchasing power of patron’s food stamps. Mitch Gruber, chief programs officer at Foodlink, said he experienced resistance from funders when starting Curbside Market, because it went against the model of giving charity.
“This is not just about charity, it’s about economic development,” he said. “The curbside market has really leveraged people’s economic power.”
Fisher said food banks need to spend part of their resources on advocating for change in policies to work on poverty and not just a charitable response to hunger, which he called the “hunger industrial complex.” It’s always been easier to get people to rally around hunger than it is to delve into solving poverty, he said.
[email protected]/(585) 363-7275