Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Editorial / The $5 billion question

The $5 billion question

As the 2015 legislative session begins in Albany, lawmakers are faced with what many no doubt see as a happy problem: how to spend $5 billion.

The money is a windfall from settlements with financial institutions and insurers accused of violating state and federal laws. New York has known since summer, when it reached a more than $3 billion settlement with BNP Paribas S.A., that big bucks were headed its way. By November, the total had reached $5.1 billion.

Legislators who have grown accustomed to year after year of multibillion-dollar deficits requiring painful decisions surely will be eager to allocate this windfall. It’s equally likely they will be pressured by a multitude of interest groups seeking part of the bounty.

It’s important, then, to be clear about how the money should—and should not—be spent.

The big “not”: Do not throw the money at things that will need ongoing funding after the onetime bonus is gone.

As Richard Brodsky, a liberal former assemblyman, and E.J. McMahon, the conservative president of the Empire Center for Public Policy, wrote in an op-ed after the BNP Paribas settlement was announced: “Never use an occasional windfall to pay for ongoing programs or tax cuts that will need new cash when the windfall is exhausted.”

Instead, use the money to fund long-needed capital investments.

No. 1 on the list should be the state’s transportation infrastructure. Everyone agrees that New York’s roads and bridges are in a sorry state, and this is a golden opportunity to do something about it.

In its 2015 policy agenda, Unshackle Upstate lists infrastructure investment as a top priority. The coalition supports the proposed creation of a $3.5 billion infrastructure bank to fund projects awarded through a regional process that identifies the most critical needs. This seems like a sound idea, but others can be considered too.

New York is unlikely to have another chance like this any time soon. Albany needs to get it right.

1/9/15 (c) 2015 Rochester Business Journal. To obtain permission to reprint this article, call 585-546-8303 or email rbj@rbj.net.

x

Check Also

Edison Tech, one of the schools that will be worked on in Phase 3 of the city schools modernization project. (Photo by Kevin Oklobzija)

Measures provide diversity guardrails for schools project (access required)

The delegation of lawmakers representing Rochester in the New York State Senate and Assembly last week trumpeted the passing of ...

Reader Rankings Winners

RBJ announces Reader Rankings honorees (access required)

The votes are in, and the Rochester Business Journal and The Daily Record are pleased to announce the 2021 Reader ...

The Science Technology and Advanced Manufacturing Park (STAMP) proposed for Genesee County, with buildings superimposed into the image. The Tonawanda Seneca Nation has filed suit, saying the project will cause environmental harm to "Big Woods," its territory on the western edge of STAMP (file image).

Senate passage of Innovation and Competition Act could have implications for Rochester region (access required)

The U.S. Senate’s passage of the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act could be the blueprint needed to make New York ...