This Week
  • Pa.-based S&T Bank Pa. plans to open an office in downtown Rochester.

  • Administrator John Garvey is moving Ontario County forward.

  • Employers are shifting to stricter ways of determining pay and benefits packages.

  • Sarah Costello wants the flower-buying experience more ecologically friendly.

  • Avani Technology Solutions' revenues are still soaring.

  • See the 20th anniversary edition of the Forty under 40 supplement.

What voters must decide

Rochester Business Journal
November 2, 2012

Unless the polls prove to be wildly off the mark, the 2012 presidential election will be decided by a narrow margin. However, a vote to decide the No. 1 issue in this election would not be close; nothing could compete with the economy and jobs.
Given this fact, it's worth considering a couple of points when evaluating President Barack Obama and challenger Mitt Romney.
First, when it comes to the performance of the U.S. economy, presidents get both more credit and more blame than they deserve. This is not an original observation, but it's worth repeating. The nation's chief executive can affect the economy in important ways, to be sure, but often what looms larger are forces the president cannot control.
Second, Mr. Obama and Mr. Romney have spent much of this campaign debating the wrong economic issue. Rather than focus on the past four years, they should have described in much greater detail how they would try to influence the economy's future course.
Mr. Romney repeatedly has attacked the president for the sluggish recovery and the slow decline in the unemployment rate, which only recently fell below 8 percent. In response, Mr. Obama has touted the addition of some 5.2 million private-sector jobs over the past 31 months.
By the numbers, both are correct. The question is how to interpret these facts.
New research by Harvard University's Carmen Rein-hart and Kenneth Rogoff, authors of the 2009 book, "This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly," shows that the path taken by the U.S. economy since the beginning of the Great Recession has been typical of-or somewhat better than-recoveries from systemic financial crises over the past century.
The chief reason is that government leaders and financial regulators moved decisively in 2008 and 2009 to prevent another Great Depression. That calamity averted, the economy began its long climb back.

Barring unexpected events here or abroad, the recovery will continue. The question now is what government can do to help the private sector build the strongest economy for the future. Voters must decide whether Mr. Obama or Mr. Romney has offered the best answer.

11/2/12 (c) 2012 Rochester Business Journal. To obtain permission to reprint this article, call 585-546-8303 or email

What You're Saying 

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add yours!

Post Your Own Comment


Not registered? Sign up now!

To Do   Text Size
Post CommentPost A Comment eMail Size1
View CommentsView All Comments PrintPrint Size2
ReprintsReprints Size3
  • E-mailed
  • Commented
  • Viewed
RBJ   Google